www-from-model/content/publications/0f4abbf1-099b-48b2-a1a1-79438c188aef/_index.md
2026-04-22 12:30:13 +00:00

48 lines
No EOL
2.7 KiB
Markdown

---
title: Distractor-resistant short-term memory is supported by transient changes in neural
stimulus representations
persons:
- michael-hanke
topics:
- neuroimaging
- predictive-data-analysis
params:
graphRootNodePID: xyzrins:publications/0f4abbf1-099b-48b2-a1a1-79438c188aef
pid: xyzrins:publications/0f4abbf1-099b-48b2-a1a1-79438c188aef
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01141
date: '2017-09-01'
title: Distractor-resistant short-term memory is supported by transient changes in
neural stimulus representations
description: Goal-directed behavior in a complex world requires the maintenance of
goal-relevant information despite multiple sources of distraction. However, the
brain mechanisms underlying distractor-resistant working or short-term memory (STM)
are not fully understood. Although early single-unit recordings in monkeys and fMRI
studies in humans pointed to an involvement of lateral prefrontal cortices, more
recent studies highlighted the importance of posterior cortices for the active maintenance
of visual information also in the presence of distraction. Here, we used a delayed
match-to-sample task and multivariate searchlight analyses of fMRI data to investigate
STM maintenance across three extended delay phases. Participants maintained two
samples (either faces or houses) across an unfilled pre-distractor delay, a distractor-filled
delay, and an unfilled post-distractor delay. STM contents (faces vs. houses) could
be decoded above-chance in all three delay phases from occipital, temporal, and
posterior parietal areas. Classifiers trained to distinguish face versus house maintenance
successfully generalized from pre- to post-distractor delays and vice versa, but
not to the distractor delay period. Furthermore, classifier performance in all delay
phases was correlated with behavioral performance in house, but not face, trials.
Our results demonstrate the involvement of distributed posterior, but not lateral
prefrontal, cortices in active maintenance during and after distraction. They also
show that the neural code underlying STM maintenance is transiently changed in the
presence of distractors and reinstated after distraction. The correlation with behavior
suggests that active STM maintenance is particularly relevant in house trials, whereas
face trials might rely more strongly on contributions from long-term memory.
kind: bibo:AcademicArticle
author:
- pid: xyzrins:persons/michael-hanke
given_name: Michael
family_name: Hanke
topic:
- pid: xyzrins:topics/neuroimaging
display_label: Neuroimaging
- pid: xyzrins:topics/predictive-data-analysis
display_label: Predictive data analysis
---