DOI import wizard: include basic bibliographic metadata in record #370

New issue

Open

opened 2026-06-29 05:18:08 +00:00 by mih · 2 comments

mih commented

2026-06-29 05:18:08 +00:00

Owner

Right now, it considers authors and title. It would be nice to include publication time and place also.

Ideally , this is done via a PROV generated_by relationship to a generic "publishing process" activity (http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000444), that took place at a specific moment (at_time) and journal/publisher/location (at_location).

Example record: https://pool.v0.trr379.de/ui/?sh%3ANodeShape=trr379ri%3ATRR379Publication&pid=trr379%3Apublications%2F4c06cfbc-e725-4f5a-9559-6e47d2ae33b9

Right now, it considers authors and title. It would be nice to include publication time and place also. Ideally , this is done via a PROV `generated_by` relationship to a generic "publishing process" activity (http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000444), that took place at a specific moment (`at_time`) and journal/publisher/location (`at_location`). Example record: https://pool.v0.trr379.de/ui/?sh%3ANodeShape=trr379ri%3ATRR379Publication&pid=trr379%3Apublications%2F4c06cfbc-e725-4f5a-9559-6e47d2ae33b9

mih commented

2026-06-29 06:51:36 +00:00

Author

Owner

It would be amazing, if the wizard would do some kind of string matching of DOI record keywords with XYZTopic names and suggest possibly matching one.

Or even just provide a field where topics can be selected/searched (same for objectives).

It would be amazing, if the wizard would do some kind of string matching of DOI record keywords with XYZTopic names and suggest possibly matching one. Or even just provide a field where topics can be selected/searched (same for objectives).

jsheunis commented

2026-06-29 08:37:23 +00:00

Owner

Or even just provide a field where topics can be selected/searched (same for objectives).

This is easy to add as well. The matching result might not be predictably accurate, but we can try.

Agreed. The DOI wizard plugin can be customized to whichever depth of complexity we feel the need to add. Adding publication time and place, if possible to be extracted consistently, makes sense to me > Or even just provide a field where topics can be selected/searched (same for objectives). This is easy to add as well. The matching result might not be predictably accurate, but we can try.